I have a love/hate relationship with
The Hunger Games. I never read the books, but I saw the first film (for my original thoughts on it, check out my post
Two Movies). I was appalled, but intrigued. I wasn't planning on going to see the sequel, but I knew that it would probably happen. Yes, this past Saturday the intrigue won out, and I decided to go see the sequel
Catching Fire with my sister and brother-in-law.
Most of the movie, I was chewing on my sweatshirt strings whispering "No, no don't do it. . . This is awful." It's a roller coaster of emotions, supported by incredible acting and a spot-on soundtrack, but then it just ended, leaving us in intense anticipation of the next movie. As we left the theater all I could say was that it was awful.
But something about it was good. I couldn't find the words to express my conflicting emotions at the time, but I have found them now. [Caution, there may be spoilers to follow!]
These stories are unnecessarily violent and brutal, but the violence isn't glorified. In the beginning of the film, the "winners" of the previous Hunger Games travel to each of the districts and face the families of the youth who died so that the "winners" could live. We see the pain on the families' faces, on the survivors' faces. We hear the remorse in their voices.
Rebellion begins to break out--this senseless killing of children has gone on too long and the people have found the hope to fight against it. The hope comes from the example of winner Katniss Everdeen (I really hate that name). Her courage in the face of fear, her sacrifice and love amid the cruelty proves that there is still goodness in humanity.
In a dystopian society of a people afraid who are ruled by phonies, she steps up as a woman who is true to herself. In a world of imbalance sputtering along in lukewarm fear and inaction, Katniss defies tyranny and fear. She is her self-sacrificing self, not the fearsome monster the Capitol wants her to be. She stays true to herself and her family, and her example of simple defiance against the tyranny sparks a movement among the people to make a change and break free from the chains that bind them. As St. Catherine of Siena said, "If you are what you should be, you will set the world ablaze." That is exactly what Katniss, the "Girl on Fire," does.
The film was very well done. The acting was in many cases phenomenal (I'm thinking Jennifer Lawrence, Jena Malone, Josh Hutcherson, Elizabeth Banks, Donald Sutherland, and Stanley Tucci to name a few of my favorites). The character development that was lacking in the first film came to be in the second. The love triangle between Katniss, Peeta (an equally awful name that reminds me of chips--or People Eating Tasty Animals--that belongs to the man who saved her life), and Gale (her childhood hunting partner) becomes deeper and more tangled.
We see the characters all beginning to realize that their time could be up at any minute, and we see them come to the decision to use their time to fight for what is right, even though it will probably cost them their lives.
So yes, I got sucked into the story and the characters and I love them. But there's still the violence and the unbelievable setting and I hate them.
Still, at the center is the story of a girl who struggles to be counter-cultural, to break the mold of what high society and politicians believe she should be. As a young Catholic woman in 21st century America, I can relate to that. I don't want Katniss's name, but I would take her spirit and courage any day.
